February 9, 2012

Common grammar mistakes

Grammarians, take note: here’s a great article from a magazine editor that identifies 20 common grammar mistakes. I’ve seen all of these. Hell, I’ve probably made all of these at one time or another.

Fewer and Less
“Less” is reserved for hypothetical quantities. “Few” and “fewer” are for things you can quantify. e.g., The firm has fewer than ten employees. e.g., The firm is less successful now that we have only ten employees.

Since and Because
“Since” refers to time. “Because” refers to causation. e.g., Since I quit drinking I’ve married and had two children. e.g., Because I quit drinking I no longer wake up in my own vomit.

Drive More Traffic to your Blog: Free Google Tools

Did you know that Google can help you increase traffic to your blog…for free?

It’s routine to use Google to gather information for blog entries, but not everyone is using the site to find hot button key words and build custom info graphics — both of which are proven to drive more traffic to your blog.

The Google AdWords Keyword Tool is a one-stop shop when it comes to the most searched words and phrases. By learning and using key terms, you can better get your blog entries in front of targets.

You can also click over to Google Chart Tools to make custom info graphics for your posts. Blog entries with these kinds of images are read and shared more than those that contain no visual. But even more importantly, when you add imagery, you instantly create another traffic source via image search.

For more blog traffic tips, check out a recent compilation by the SEO Gods at SEOMoz.

February 6, 2012

Put a hashtag on it

If you were one of the more than a hundred million people who tuned into yesterday’s Super Bowl broadcast, it was hard to ignore the introduction of hashtags to ads, encouraging people to interact with various companies on Twitter. While some hashtags made some brand correlation like Bud Light Premium’s #makeitpremium push, others were a stretch like Hulu’s #mushymush. I can get past that because what you are really trying to do with a hashtag is create a platform for your customers to interact with.

But what if that interaction goes sideways and the hashtag  turns into a pun attacking your brand? Gotta hand it to the editors over at Esquire. They took a sampling of the “twitterverse” and found some great puns not utilizing Super Bowl ad specific hashtags as the brands intended. In some cases the hashtags were even used as as a weapon directed specifically at the brands that created them. My personal favorite is Jack in the Box’s #marrybacon campaign that asks the question, “If you love bacon, why don’t you marry it?” The response from one tweeter? “That #marrybacon commercial made me feel like a whore after eating bacon-jalapeno poppers and sliders with bacon on them.”

So the big question is, how do you stop hastags from biting back? You don’t. You simply have to be prepared to get the good, bad and ugly responses.
January 24, 2012

Simmer FB Posts for 3+ Hours

Ever wonder how your post frequency on Facebook relates to fan engagement (likes, shares, comments, etc.)? Analytics company EdgeRank Checker thinks they have the winning formula…at least based on today’s available data and user habits.

Covered by TechCrunch last week, EdgeRank’s latest study suggests each Facebook post should be given a “lifetime” of no less than three hours as the majority of likes and comments happen over the 180 minutes following the post. (READ: GIVE PEOPLE SOME TIME TO SEE IT!). Posting more frequently may prematurely kill off the post’s momentum.

Courtesy of e-strategyblog.com

If you’re posting often and lack the quality engagement you desire, let your posts simmer for a longer period of time. Posting less often may be the best path to more meaningful interactions for your business. This will also alleviate the pressure some face in rapidly pumping out good new content. (SCORE!).

January 23, 2012

Communications 101, Honesty Is ALWAYS A Good Policy

In case you don’t live in Western Washington or didn’t hear about Seattle’s “snowmaggedon” and ensuing “iceaggedon” the week of January 16, let me refresh you. The storm dumped well over a foot of snow in spots, blasted the region with a thick layer of ice,  was responsible for at least one death and left hundreds of thousands of people without power.

But what I found really interesting was the fact that meteorologists actually admitted they got the forecast wrong. First with overestimating the amount of snow Seattle would receive and second when they admitted to prematurely forecasting the snow and ice would stop almost a day earlier than it actually did.

Now getting a weather forecast wrong is nothing new. But what I did find refreshing was the honesty from a number of forecasters admitting (ghasp) they actually got the forecast wrong.

A prime example of this comes from one of the Pacific Northwest’s most respected weather forecasters, professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Washington Cliff Mass. In a blog post on Thursday, January 19, Mass wrote this:

Well folks, this is not my profession’s finest hour.    We had forecast the continuation of the light freezing drizzle of yesterday (an irritant, but not a major threat) and then a warm-up today with rain coming in late. Our models did not indicate that the precipitation would move so far north, so fast.

How does this apply to the corporate PR that VOXUS practices? Well, if you get something wrong (which everyone does), admit your mistakes. Promise me, sugar-coating the truth ALWAYS comes back to bite you when it comes to the world of communications. Honesty… it’s always a good policy.

January 13, 2012

Ethofy simplifies sales channel management

With customers such as Microsoft, IBM and Toshiba, Seattle-based Ethofy is hardly in its infancy; in fact, it was one of the first area startups to recognize the potential of cloud computing.  Today, Ethofy automates critical sales channel activities through SaaS solutions that tackle a thorny problem: how to easily entice channel partners into using a business’s marketing materials and content.  As part of our continuing series of interviews with entrepreneurs, we asked Rob Savette, the company’s vice president of sales and marketing, to share his insight into Ethofy and the role social media tools can play in sales strategies.

Question: What was the problem Ethofy wanted to solve when it was founded in 2003?  Since then, the company’s products have certainly evolved.  Tell us a little about your goals today and what you’re delivering to the marketplace.

Answer: Since 2003 Ethofy has been primarily focused on helping companies communicate and sell more effectively through their sales channels. Obviously, that market has rapidly evolved – both in the actual market dynamics as well as the technologies and solutions that service that market. As a small, entrepreneurial company we have constantly worked to stay at the forefront of those changes. I believe that the largest shift in that dynamic has been to move from a fundamental “pull” model to much more of the “push” model we see today. Whereas 10 years ago people were developing partner portals and programs that put the onus on partners to go and get what they needed, today we not only work hard at having those resources available, but we also provide mechanisms and solutions that push information, materials and tools out to the partners as well. I believe that the recent evolution of social marketing tools will play a huge role in that push process.

Question: We’re particularly interested in your views on utilizing social media to boost business results.  What social media channels and tools have you found to be most effective in the business setting?  For a small business just now entering the social media arena, what advice would you give?

Answer: I’ll skip right to the second part of your question because of two reasons: 1) the list is too long to cover fairly in a short time, and 2) more significantly, I think the answer to the second part drives the answer to the first.

The main piece of advice I’d give is that before you start to research and choose social marketing solutions, get very clear about what you’d like to achieve.  The decisions you make regarding what you want to address, whether it be immediate sales, building your pipeline, improving customer service, growing your customer base, defining or redefining your brand, etc. will be the absolute driving factor in your search for a social solution.  Once you’ve made that decision, you can then decide what to shop for in the tool market.

Question: How do you think businesses can most effectively use microsites?  We’ve seen independent or sole proprietors utilize them, and wondered about the time vs. return ratio.  How can a business ensure that a microsite is appropriate for its marketing mix, and do you have any tips for how to best turn a microsite into an effective communications tool?

Answer: Wow – this is a pretty deep question that ties to many issues that are specific to an organization. In general, I would say the following:

For small organizations: if there is a specific set of business problems that can be best solved by a microsite, then go for it. An example would be a company that spends a great deal of time working through configuration questions to generate leads and sales. This type of complex problem can be solved very effectively by a microsite.  I advise against “taking a shot” at a microsite because you think it will be great. This type of vagueness can lead to a lengthy development process, and produces relatively expensive and ineffective microsites.

For large companies: assuming that a large company supports either a large sales team, a large partner program or both, I would highly recommend investing in the development of microsites in your marketing strategy. Microsites are the type of tool that allow your sales people to focus more on the act of selling by allowing the microsite to provide some of the information and messaging transfer. They will also allow you to provide powerful and complex solutions to your partner (a great value add to them) while guaranteeing you control the look, feel, and messaging of the microsite.

January 12, 2012

Truth and the media

Arthur Bisbane, Public Editor of the New York Times, has an article up today asking “Should the Times Be A Truth Vigilante?” The question at the heart of the matter is whether journalists – specifically beat reporters – should “challenge ‘facts’ that are asserted by newsmakers they write about.”

…on the campaign trail, Mitt Romney often says President Obama has made speeches “apologizing for America,” a phrase to which Paul Krugman objected in a December 23 column arguing that politics has advanced to the “post-truth” stage.

As an Op-Ed columnist, Mr. Krugman clearly has the freedom to call out what he thinks is a lie. My question for readers is: should news reporters do the same?

If so, then perhaps the next time Mr. Romney says the president has a habit of apologizing for his country, the reporter should insert a paragraph saying, more or less:

“The president has never used the word ‘apologize’ in a speech about U.S. policy or history. Any assertion that he has apologized for U.S. actions rests on a misleading interpretation of the president’s words.”

I have long been a critic of the news media’s current approach to coverage. It had its birth in journalism schools decades ago when, as a natural extension of “objectivity” in journalism, these soon-to-be reporters were taught to remove themselves entirely from the story and let the article speak for itself. When taken to its logical conclusion, this school of thought dictates that any statement by the reporter disputing one side or the other re-inserts the journalist back into the news, and should thus be avoided.

This also has the side benefit of being easier, as the reporter does not need to be an expert on the subject matter. One could attribute this to laziness, and there is certainly some of that, but more realistically it’s a by-product of news organizations that are stretched way to thin to do justice to the news – a result of years of cost cutting. And so you get he-said, she-said articles, and the reporter calls it a day. These issues – a mis-guided effort to achieve objectivity and a steadily decreasing pool of quality reporters employed by news organizations – go hand in hand.

The problem is that there are such things as facts and truth. Merely reporting what each side says without any effort to point out that one side is either ill-informed or lying is not doing the reader a service or justice to the news.

At its heart, the question is: what is a news article? If it is a conduit to pass along talking points, then the current system works. If it’s a tool to provide the reader with a better understanding of the world, then it must offer context, scrutiny and analysis.

The media establishment regularly fails at the latter.

(via Steve Benen, Washington Monthly)

January 10, 2012

Say What! Odd Interview Questions

I’ve seen it all… OK ALMOST everything over the years both as a journalist and as a PR professional. That’s why when Glassdoor.com, billed as an online resource for helping people make informed decisions about their work, put out its list of the top 25 oddball interview questions, nothing surprised me. And then it got me thinking, even though these interview questions are for prospective employees, a reporter could ask just the same questions to see what kind of reaction they got out of an exec. And… gasp… they could be on live TV! So here are some of the more odd… errr interesting questions from Glassdoor.

  • “How many people are using Facebook in San Francisco at 2:30pm on Friday?” – Asked at Google.com
  • “Just entertain me for five minutes, I’m not going to talk.” – Asked at Acosta
  • “If Germans were the tallest people in the world, how would you prove it?” – Asked at Hewlett-Packard

Next time you prepare for a media interview, maybe you should have these top of mind!

December 19, 2011

2011 From A New Media Perspective

Here’s some proof that in 2011, we really do consume our media online. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the 2011 year in review from Google’s perspective. Interesting news from an interesting new media viewpoint.

December 5, 2011

It’s Holiday Season AND Recap Season

Time to grab that egg nog, chop down that Christmas tree and light that menorah. Oh… and don’t forget to come up with your annual recap of the biggest events in your particular industry this time of year.

That’s right, while you may think journalists are just frothing at the mouth to hear about your latest widget (they may be), they also really want insight into the beating pulse of what’s going on in your industry. You see, journalists for the most part are communicators and YOU are the expert. Therefore, they want, no NEED you to tell them what you consider to be the most important events in your industry for the year. So before you go on that extended holiday break, pull together a list of the top events in your industry for the year and share it with the world (or some of your favorite journalists).

For example, I, being a PR professional, might come up with a list of 5 biggest PR gaffes of 2011. Without going into detail, here’s my unscientific list in no particular order: 1) Netflix’s flip flop 2) Penn State’s sex abuse cover up 3) Herman Cain’s sex scandal 4) Bank of America’s ATM fees 5) The NBA lockout.

Now back to the more broad topic of annual recaps… One important thing to keep in mind revolves around timing. Make sure you get your list out well in advance of the holidays. Just like you, reporters also take vacation time around the holidays and often like to have their year in review stories done well in advance. Not to mention, the later you recap the year’s events, the more likely a competitor will beat you to the punch.

So what do you consider the most important events in your industry? Get brainstorming on your top list of (fill in the blank) for 2011…